Saturday, February 8, 2014

TMA 691 Online Response #4: Son of Rambow and Media Effects

One could view Son of Rambow simply as a film about the positive expressive power of film: young Will Proudfoot, already an artist with his biblical sketchbook, finally discovers the medium through which he can truly exorcise his demons.  Along the way, he overcomes a domineering mother, first through disobedience and then by winning her over to his side when she cuts ties with a puritanical sect known as “The Brethren.”  Acceptance of what was once thought to be corruptive is arguably a theme of Son of Rambow, but the inclusion of another character, Didier, makes the film’s presentation of media effects more complex.  Film functions differently for Will than it does for Didier and thus reflects a prediction made by Charters: “If it is established that children are moved by pictures toward dislike for one social value and toward liking for another, and if it is shown that both facts and errors are learned and remembered, it is apparent that motion pictures have fundamental influences which may be exerted in any direction” (6).  Son of Rambow presents two case studies, one in which a character is effected by media, while the other is merely affected.

First Blood effects Will tremendously; visiting Lee Carter’s home for the first time, he views it voyeuristically from a canoe, while Lee records bootleg copies for his brother.  This experience is Will’s first with multimedia—he is not even allowed to watch educational documentaries about fire or the wheel when he is at school—and it proves to be the missing ingredient for the narrative he is constructing to reconcile the loss of his father.  After watching First Blood, Will becomes “the Son of Rambo,” a role of empowerment.  Though he begins to wear a headband and other accouterments from time to time, his adoption of the role is more psychological than outward.  His first declaration, after all, happens in a dream during an exchange with a villainous scarecrow:
“Who are you?”  the Scarecrow asks.
“I am the Son of Rambo.  What have you done with my dad?”  Will becomes muscle-bound and proceeds to rescue his father as the dream unfolds.  


He publicly announces his role for the first time when filming screen tests with Lee, who is more technician than artist.  Manipulated into performing stunts, Will falls out of a tree while being filmed, and when he gets back on his feet he runs in circles, screaming, but in control.  Lee asks, “Wait, what are you doing?”
Will approaches the camera for an extreme close-up, and with as much malice as he can muster he says, “I am the Son of Rambo.” 
“Hang on.  You want to be the Son of Rambo?”  From that moment onward, the boys’ screen tests become less derivative of Rambo and more like Will’s imaginings from his sketches.  Rather than reenact scenes that have already been filmed, the boys do something much more praiseworthy: they become creators. 

   While film inspires Will to work out his problems through creation, it has a different effect on Didier, who seems to be a superficial result of media.  Part Michael Jackson, part Robert Smith, and part Patrick Swayze (albeit self-proclaimed), Didier arrives with much fanfare at Will and Lee’s prep school with a group of other French exchange students.  His power as opinion leader is evident as he quickly gathers an entourage that follows him through the school grounds, adoring his every move.  He and Will cross paths eventually, at which point Didier discloses his greatest wish: “Well, to be star of movie is my dream, my friend.”
Will obliges Didier, partly out of necessity; Lee has been suspended and, therefore, unavailable to film for a time.  As soon as Didier enters the picture, though, the film starts to lose its integrity.  It becomes all Didier, all the time.  The focus of their film shifts from the protagonist, the Son of Rambo, to Didier, also known as Wolf.  Around the school Will begins to enter the spotlight, though not because others know his name; instead he is “that little boy making a film with Didier.”  To the chagrin of Lee, other kids become involved in the film for the same reason as Didier: to be seen.

Didier and crew, reminiscent of a shot from "Beat It" (below).


Jealousy aside, Lee takes issue with Didier and others’ inclusion in the film because they are ruining something that was once more pure.  Though the film was not without its own obvious influences, Didier gives the boys’ Son of Rambow an MTV-like infusion, in effect mainstreaming it.  From a study group standpoint, he gives the boys’ movie the sex appeal it was lacking and completes “the process of apparent convergence of outlooks” (Gerbner 181).  The problem with Didier, though, is he seems to have been created by a study group, as if he were the result of a survey, circa 1985, asking teens what they most like and dislike about the pop stars of that era.  He is “the theoretical elaboration and empirical verification of television’s cultivation of common perspectives” (183).  He meets the coolness criteria for teenage boys, while also being attractive enough for girls; his supposed brooding and dangerous nature appeals to both groups.  However, he is also boring and bored, as he tells his followers.  Didier functions as a critique of the in-crowd, in all of its contradictions.  As an opinion leader, he funnels current trends to his entourage, but he emphasizes style over substance.  His inability to appropriate these styles in an original way makes him a rehash, a retread, which does not go unnoticed by his fellow French exchange students, who are not blinded by his exoticness like the British are (who, by the way, gradually become more like him as the story progresses).  Will, on the other hand, fashions First Blood into something all his own.  Intellectual property reasons notwithstanding, he and Lee create Son of Rambow, different on the surface--its title--and in content than its inspiration, a claim that Didier cannot make. 

No comments:

Post a Comment