Reflecting
on our week of Storytelling and the material we covered, I can think of several
applications in the classes I teach. In
my English classes, I always teach a unit called “Elements of Fiction,” in
which we discuss plot, setting, character, and theme, along with other common
literary devices. With character, especially, students would
benefit from transcribing prose description of a character into a screenplay to
get a better sense of how this character would appear should they meet him or
her in real life. When I teach character and characterization, we discuss different ways that writers reveal the
personalities of their characters: through direct characterization (for
example, “Mr. Anderson was an angry man”), or indirect characterization (which
could be a description of their appearance, speech, thoughts, actions, or
others’ reactions). While all of these
apply to a written text, one would be hard pressed to read a character’s
thoughts in a visual text.
Knowing how
to understand a character/person in any medium without any type of omniscient
narrator is important because of its real-life applications. Real people do not reveal their character
through direct characterization (“Hi, I’m Bill.
I am a gossip and backstabber”), nor can we ever know their
thoughts. Knowing how to interpret
appearances, words, actions, and others’ reactions is a form of inference-
making and a valuable social skill.
Practicing
characterization through writing a screenplay allows for reflection on human
behavior. As I wrote my screenplay
assignment, I constantly had to ask myself, is
this how people really talk? Is this
action something people could see, and does it reflect what is going on
internally in the character? It’s
difficult to write some of these actions without feeling too reliant on
clichés; for example, I don’t think someone who’s planning on doing something
devious will really have shifty eyes (at least someone who plans on succeeding
in their plans). How can that
characteristic be represented then? The
pre-production processes we discussed—treatments, screenplays, storyboarding,
shooting scripts, etc.—all seem to come down to representation. When telling our own stories in a visual
medium, we may realize just how subjective our memories are, given that what we’re
describing is limited to the actions one would see and not what we were
thinking during the event (this is not accounting, of course, of a more
POV-centric film). When dealing with
another text, our increased consciousness of something like characterization
will help us think more critically about what we see. Characters—real or fictional—are constantly
presented to us with apparent attributes; knowing more about the way they are
constructed can help us see through the cracks just a little bit.
No comments:
Post a Comment