With Composition, I find myself a
little out of my depth, which is good because I have the opportunity to learn a
lot about something I knew next to nothing about before. When we were recording the footage for our
Editing Exercise last week, I told Emily that when I take pictures my instincts
are to break all of the rules: to center everything, to place the horizon in
the middle of a shot, etc. Granted, my
inexperience with photography and shooting video was such that I didn’t know I
was breaking any rules. However, it
makes sense that I’ve never been too enamored with anything I’ve shot.
I look
forward to teaching these composition principles to my future classes (both
Language Arts and Film). One thing that
makes English Language Arts tricky (and possibly the reason that so many
students don’t like English classes) is the difficulty in making abstract
concepts more concrete. There’s not just
one correct way to write, nor is there one correct direction to go in a
narrative, argumentative, or expositional paper. So much freedom seems to overwhelm students,
young and old, as writing continues to be an elusive thing for them. I mention this because it’s always refreshing
to teach material that is more concrete/skill-based.
True,
composing good shots is as much of an art as it is a science, but students
should be able to know if they’ve done a shot correctly or not with some
immediacy. When I write objectives up on
the white board, I do so with the intention of introducing concepts/skills that
students will be able to master in a short period of time, if not after one
class period. That doesn’t always happen
with a traditional writing objective (“Students will strengthen a claim with at
last two pieces of evidence,” for example).
In a composition assignment, I imagine students understanding the
difference between what’s good and bad, simply because they get a clear visual
of the examples and they have clear objectives: “Students will compose a shot
that follows the rule of thirds,” or “Students
will shoot a series of shots that includes a wide shot, medium shot, and
close-up.” I don’t want to undersell/underestimate composition or make it seem easier than it is (after all, I’m still a novice,
having become familiar with some of these terms only a week ago), but I do
think it is something that will make sense to students.
I think that you're right in that its easy for a student to understand the concept - that's low level knowledge. But the trick is to try to get the students to consistently apply that knowledge - to evaluate shots - to understand why they should break the rules. So while the rules/concepts can be taught in a short period of time, those higher level abilities are something that they will finess throughout their life.
ReplyDelete