Chronicle
of a Summer is at its most reflexive in the last ten minutes of the film as
Rouch and Morin have a discussion with their subjects, who have just seen
themselves on film. Says Rouch: “You’ve
just seen yourself on screen. Edgar and
I would like your opinion.”
While the
cast has trouble agreeing on anything, their responses point towards an
understanding of the constructed nature of documentary. Speaking of the discussion between Angelo and
Landry, one subject says, “It’s all unnatural, it’s completely phony.” Another subject says of the entire film,
“Looking at it, I found the film extremely painful. When it’s not totally boring, it’s at the
cost of total decency.” Mary-Lou adds,
“In order to get a sparkle of truth, the character has to be alone and on the
verge of breaking down”—a reference, most likely, to her appearances they chose
to put in the film.
In their
argument of what (or what’s not) true, the subjects of Chronicle of a Summer admit to a feeling of alienation in seeing
the way they are presented on screen.
The ending, in turn, has an alienating effect on the audience, at least
in the sense that their understanding of the
way things are is upended as soon as the subjects begin to question their
representation and the film as a whole.
Nichols explains the intentionality of alienation in the Reflexive mode,
as it “separates us from prevailing assumptions” (199). It “[induces] an ‘aha!’ effect, where we
grasp a principle or structure at work that helps account for how we understand
and represent the world” (199).
With a
little editing, Chronicle of a Summer
very well could have turned out as a Participatory doc. That the majority of the film appears as it
does—a documentary belonging to a more recognizable mode—invites the audience
to consider what subjects of other documentaries would say about the way they
are presented if given the chance. For example, what would Paul from Salesman say about his scenes in the
film? What opinion would any characters
from Harlan County USA have of their
portrayal, be they strikers, union brass, or corporate men?
In Chronicle of a Summer, like other
Reflexive documentaries, “it is only as the film unfolds” that we notice the
jarring techniques that produce alienation effects (198, 199). Similarly in Land without Bread, it is only after the accumulation of insults
dealt by the narrator that the audience realizes the film is inviting them to
question elements, such as the objective Voice-of-God narration, of the
Expository mode. The focus on formal
reflexivity—as seen in all of the Reflexive docs we have watched in class—is
subtler than a purely political reflexive performance. Though belonging to a different medium—theater—Anna
Deveare Smith’s Fires in the Mirror
begs us to question our assumptions about race, as she performs blackness and Jewishness. Its alienating
effect is apparent from the beginning.
For another example of outright alienation as a means of questioning our
assumptions, see Sandra Bernhard’s Without You I’m Nothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment